Guidelines for QFCs
Philosophy
302—Mind and Knowledge: Descartes to Kant
Michael Taber
St. Mary’s College of Maryland, USA
As indicated on the Course Requirements page
for this course, a portion of each student’s grade is comprised of the best 15
of their Questions for Consideration. These assignments are in lieu of other
ways of grading students’ attendance or participation. For this course, there
is no other way of directly grading attendance or participation. (They are in
other ways unavoidably graded indirectly, of course, insofar as success this
semester would be very difficult to achieve without regular attendance and
without heady engagement with the material.)
Students may not write more than
one QFC for each class meeting, but may elect to write more than 15, in which
case only the 15 highest grades will count. The maximum possible score on each
QFC submitted is 1.2 (0.3 x 4 = 1.2). (1.2 x 15 = 18, which is the highest
possible point value for this component of the course.)
What is a QFC?
Except for the first day of
class, each day on which we have new reading due (there are 22 such days in the
course schedule) can be a day on which students submit a Question for Consideration
based on that reading. (If there is more than one reading for a given day, it’s
the student’s choice—but as noted above, no more than one QFC per class
session. Hence, no multiple submissions as make-ups.) Since 22-15=7, this means
that each of you can skip up to 7 QFC-days and still
(theoretically, at least) get your full 18 QFC points.
On each such class, students
will register their attendance by handing in a Question for Consideration. This
is the only way attendance will be counted. Only typed
QFCs will be accepted. These are
never accepted electronically, in lieu of attendance; credit is given
only to students who have these in class, since the purpose of the QFC is to
promote informed dialogue among prepared discussants.
A QFC may be about any
philosophical (not just historical or biographical) aspect of the assigned
readings we have for that day’s session, but should include the following:
1.
It must be clearly and
directly tied to a text by indicating a sentence or passage quoted from
the text, with the page number of the quotation.
2.
Not only should a selection and a page number
appear, but you should ask a philosophical question
(that’s the “Q” in “QFC”) regarding that selection or the context in which it
appeared.
3.
Supply a thoughtful reason you are asking this
question. (“I just found this random passage a few minutes before class, in
order to slap together this assignment” does not count as supplying a
thoughtful reason.)
4.
Hazard an educated guess as to the answer to the
question you raised. By an educated guess I mean a guess informed by the rest
of the text; so the best QFCs will include
5.
a quotation from
another point in the text to support your own proposed answer to the question
you had raised.
Length usually exceeds one
(standard) page, but should not exceed two.
In class, I will call on some
people to read their QFCs. So be prepared to share yours with the group. You
have eager and engaging fellow students, and we all can be helpful in working
out the answers to questions about the text together. So consider the class a
collection of allies in the struggle for understanding, and the QFCs as
providing some focused, raw material for the rest of us to try to help with.
You need to submit only 15, for
only your 15 best count. For those days on which you elect not to submit a QFC,
you are NOT absolved of the academic responsibility of
being prepared for class. This means having done the reading carefully, and
being fair game for being asked questions.
Rubric for QFCs
|
0.1 points |
0.2 points |
0.3 points |
Direct quotation, correctly sourced |
Evidence of reading or listening, some omissions or mistakes
in content |
Identifiable point from the reading, correctly written and
locatable |
Very good choice of clearly identifiable quotation, with some
philosophical import |
Question about selected passage |
Present; may have some omissions or mistakes in interpreting |
Clear and understandable, relevant to philosophical argument |
Advances understanding of some complexity critical to author’s
argument, and points to philosophical import |
Reason for asking this question |
Present, clearly connected to question; may have some
omissions or mistakes in interpreting |
Clear and understandable, relevant to philosophical argument |
Clear and reflective, indicating appreciation of why the
question is philosophically important; addresses some complexity |
Educated guess as to the answer |
At least partially present; may have some omissions or
mistakes in interpreting |
Clear, appropriately referring to at least one other quotation
deep into the reading, correctly interpreted |
Contextualized with reference to broader themes and other
quotations in the reading |
Send me mail:
mstaber at smcm dot edu
Go to the home page for this
course.
Go to Michael Taber's home page.
Go to the SMCM home page.