Course Description
Philosophy 120—Intro to Ethics
Michael Taber

St. Mary’s College of Maryland (USA)

 


The views we have about good and bad play a decisive role not only in determining our actions, but in determining how we think of ourselves and others, and how others think of us. Such views are, therefore, of paramount personal and social importance. But how often do we get the opportunity to think explicitly and seriously about our moral beliefs and about what can be said for or against them? This sort of philosophical examination is what we will undertake this semester.

Philosophical enterprise calls not just for clearly stating your position on a certain problem, but also for thinking about what support there is for it in the face of possible objections. That is, to think philosophically is to think an issue through so that you can explain to others (as well as to yourself) what strikes you as sensible about having those views as opposed to having other views. After all, anyone can say that morality reduces to maximizing happiness or that a woman has a right to an abortion, so we will be going deeper to discover what support, if any, such claims have. You all have probably thought some about moral theory and its application to several of the issues we will talk about this semester, but the point of this course is to provide you with an opportunity to think more carefully, more philosophically, about these subjects.

To carry this out, we will be reading what others have said about these issues, not necessarily for the sake of agreeing with them (although there certainly will be readings with which you agree), but rather for the sake of using the readings to get clear on what some of the questions are within each subject, what is at stake in each subject, and what some examples of carefully considered positions look like. So we will be using these readings as crucial springboards for our discussions. And these discussions will be an important component of the course.

If this were a course the point of which was to test on you such items as “Was Aristotle Plato’s teacher or was Plato Aristotle’s teacher?” or “What are the four examples used by Kant to illustrate his categorical imperative?” then attendance would be less important. One could read carefully on one’s own and master that kind of content. But the point of studying philosophy goes beyond factual knowledge (which is not to say that factual knowledge isn’t important).

Because studying philosophy is the development of a skill and not so much the memorization of a body of knowledge, students will need to engage themselves with the readings and with other students’ responses to those readings. To engage oneself in this sense is not merely to pay attention to the material, but to be able to discuss, question, explain, support, or criticize.

Hence, the course’s attendance policy….


Course learning outcomes

At the completion of PHIL120, students will be able:

1.     to apply views of ethical theorists to issues of continuing relevance as demonstrated by applying them to issues relevant to society or to them personally;

2.     to situate how thinkers about ethics are responding to other such thinkers as demonstrated by explaining their similarities and divergences from other thinkers;

3.     to construct a critique of the reasoning used for various arguments in ethics as demonstrated by being able to object to thinkers' reasoning in support of their positions;

4.     to ground in primary sources claims about  thinkers in ethics as demonstrated by anchoring their attributions to thinkers by citing relevant texts;

5.     to demonstrate effective oral communication of ideas in ethics as demonstrated by contributing to class discussion or giving class presentation;

6.     to demonstrate effective written communication of ideas in ethics as demonstrated by writing well-organized essays.

 

Land acknowledgment pledge

We acknowledge that the land on which we are learning, working, and gathering today is the ancestral home of the Yacocomico and Piscataway Peoples. We also acknowledge that St. Mary’s City was partly built and sustained by enslaved people of African descent. Through this acknowledgment, we recognize these communities and all those who have been displaced and enslaved through colonization.

The goal of the land acknowledgment pledge is not only to respect and honor the contributions of Indigenous Peoples and enslaved people of African descent, but to support and learn from all diverse communities in order to build a more sustainable future.


Send me mail:  mstaber at smcm dot edu

Go to the home page for this course.

Go to Michael Taber's home page.

Go to the SMCM home page.